Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device (PREMIER study): 3-year results with the application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification

56Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background The pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic) has presented as a safe and efficacious treatment for small- and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms. Independently adjudicated long-term results of the device in treating these lesions are still indeterminate. We present 3-year results, with additional application of a flow diverter specific occlusion scale. Methods PREMIER (prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with pipeline embolization device) is a prospective, single-arm trial. Inclusion criteria were patients with unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms ≤12 mm. Primary effectiveness (complete aneurysm occlusion) and safety (major neurologic event) endpoints were independently monitored and adjudicated. Results As per the protocol, of 141 patients treated with a PED, 25 (17.7%) required angiographic followup after the first year due to incomplete aneurysm occlusion. According to the Core Radiology Laboratory review, three (12%) of these patients progressed to complete occlusion, with an overall rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at 3 years of 83.3% (115/138). Further angiographic evaluation using the modified Cekirge–Saatci classification demonstrated that complete occlusion, neck residual, or aneurysm size reduction occurred in 97.1%. The overall combined safety endpoint at 3 years was 2.8% (4/141), with only one non-debilitating major event occurring after the first year. There was one case of aneurysm recurrence but no cases of delayed rupture in this series. Conclusions The PED device presents as a safe and effective modality in treating small- and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms. The application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification attested the long-term durability with higher rate of successful aneurysm occlusion and no documented aneurysm rupture.

References Powered by Scopus

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment

3218Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review

1289Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: Results from a multicenter clinical trial

913Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Long-term outcomes of flow diversion for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology Placement for Small-and Medium-sized Aneurysms Achieves Early Complete Occlusion

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flow Diverter Performance in Aneurysms Arising From the Posterior Communicating Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hanel, R. A., Cortez, G. M., Lopes, D. K., Nelson, P. K., Siddiqui, A. H., Jabbour, P., … Kallmes, D. F. (2023). Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device (PREMIER study): 3-year results with the application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 15(3), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018501

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Researcher 7

39%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

58%

Neuroscience 8

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

4%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free