Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment

10Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool to improve and speed up motor rehabilitation after stroke, but inconsistent clinical effects refrain tDCS from clinical implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the need for individualized tDCS configurations in stroke, considering interindividual variability in brain anatomy and motor function representation. We simulated tDCS in individualized MRI-based finite element head models of 21 chronic stroke subjects and 10 healthy age-matched controls. An anatomy-based stimulation target, i.e. the motor hand knob, was identified with MRI, whereas a motor function-based stimulation target was identified with EEG. For each subject, we simulated conventional anodal tDCS electrode configurations and optimized electrode configurations to maximize stimulation strength within the anatomical and functional target. The normal component of the electric field was extracted and compared between subjects with stroke and healthy, age-matched controls, for both targets, during conventional and optimized tDCS. Electrical field strength was significantly lower, more variable and more frequently in opposite polarity for subjects with stroke compared to healthy age-matched subjects, both for the anatomical and functional target with conventional, i.e. non-individualized, electrode configurations. Optimized, i.e. individualized, electrode configurations increased the electrical field strength in the anatomical and functional target for subjects with stroke but did not reach the same levels as in healthy subjects. Considering individual brain structure and motor function is crucial for applying tDCS in subjects with stroke. Lack of individualized tDCS configurations in subjects with stroke results in lower electric fields in stimulation targets, which may partially explain the inconsistent clinical effects of tDCS in stroke trials.

References Powered by Scopus

EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis

17881Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

7415Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data

7010Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electric field simulation and appropriate electrode positioning for optimized transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients: an in Silico model

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent advancements in optimising transcranial electrical stimulation: reducing response variability through individualised stimulation

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Cruijsen, J., Dooren, R. F., Schouten, A. C., Oostendorp, T. F., Frens, M. A., Ribbers, G. M., … Selles, R. W. (2022). Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment. NeuroImage: Clinical, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103178

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

53%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

24%

Researcher 3

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

43%

Engineering 4

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

14%

Neuroscience 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free