International student mobility options following Brexit: An analysis of the genesis of Britain's Turing Scheme

0Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines the interplay between geopolitical goals, governance and International Student Mobility (henceforth ISM). It explores how the United Kingdom's newly envisaged domestic credit-mobility programme (the Turing Scheme) is reshaping the spatiality of their outward student mobility flows to bolster a global sense of internationalisation through ISM. During its emergence, the Turing Scheme was often positioned as an antithesis to the pre-established Erasmus+ Scheme which had a strong focus on European integration, instead it focused on promoting a ‘Global Britain’ narrative. This paper conducts a content analysis of Hansard (transcripts of debates in the U.K.'s Houses of Parliament), to reflect on ISM decision-making, debating the choices made and unmade regarding the development of the Turing Scheme. This research illuminated multiple issues, adding to the debate about the importance of ISM for geopolitical purposes, and how these can underpin credit-mobility schemes, and shape these during periods of large-scale geopolitical change.

References Powered by Scopus

International Student Migration: Mapping the Field and New Research Agendas

309Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theorising the Spaces of Student Migration

268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education

267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fox, O., & Beech, S. E. (2024). International student mobility options following Brexit: An analysis of the genesis of Britain’s Turing Scheme. Population, Space and Place, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2727

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

73%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

20%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 10

63%

Social Sciences 3

19%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

13%

Arts and Humanities 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0