Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect

3.3kCitations
Citations of this article
1.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Consider a series of companies in a supply chain, each of whom orders from its immediate upstream member. In this setting, inbound orders from a downstream member serve as a valuable informational input to upstream production and inventory decisions. This paper claims that the information transferred in the form of "orders" tends to be distorted and can misguide upstream members in their inventory and production decisions. In particular, the variance of orders may be larger than that of sales, and the distortion tends to increase as one moves upstream - a phenomenon termed "bullwhip effect." This paper analyzes four sources of the bullwhip effect: demand signal processing, rationing game, order batching, and price variations. Actions that can be taken to mitigate the detrimental impact of this distortion are also discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

BAYES SOLUTION TO DYNAMIC INVENTORY MODELS UNDER UNKNOWN DEMAND DISTRIBUTION.

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can the production smoothing model of inventory behavior be saved?

215Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

OPTIMAL STOCKING POLICIES FOR LOW USAGE ITEMS IN MULTI-ECHELON INVENTORY SYSTEMS.

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

3021Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perspectives in supply chain risk management

1852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies

1838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 606

83%

Professor / Associate Prof. 57

8%

Researcher 46

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 24

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 424

55%

Engineering 222

29%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 76

10%

Computer Science 46

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 10
References: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free