Does concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ influence the prognostic outcome after neoadjuvant therapy in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma?

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a precursor to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and the coexistence of DCIS with IDC is often observed during the diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of study is to investigated the clinicopathological features and prognosis of triple-negative IDC with DCIS following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Additionally, we explored the risk factors for residual DCIS in these patients post-NAT. Methods: This study included patients with stages II-III triple-negative breast cancer with histologically confirmed IDC who underwent radical surgery after NAT between January 2011 and December 2021. Baseline data, clinical features, pathological outcomes, and prognostic information were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 315 patients were enrolled and categorized into the IDC + DCIS (n = 67) and IDC groups (n = 248) according to the composition of the pre-NAT biopsy. The proportion of patients with histological grade G3 (78.2% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.004) and a Ki-67 index > 20% (98.4% vs. 86.6%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the IDC group than in the IDC + DCIS group. Although no significant difference was observed in the 5-year overall survival (OS) (93.4% vs. 90.8%, p = 0.298) between the two groups, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (90.6% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.041) of the IDC + DCIS group was significantly better than that in the IDC group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that IDC + DCIS (HR: 0.502; 95% CI, 0.284–0.952; p = 0.048) was an independent prognostic factor for DFS. In addition, the clinical T3–T4 stage (OR = 3.891; 95% CI, 1.320–15.219, p = 0.040) and clinical N1–N3 (OR = 4.500; 95% CI, 1.495–13.564, p = 0.012) were independent preoperative predictors of residual DCIS after NAT in patients with IDC and DCIS components. Conclusion: The presence of DCIS component in patients with triple-negative IDC is associated with lower tumor aggressiveness and improved DFS after NAT compared to patients without DCIS. Additionally, clinical T and N stages are risk factors for residual DCIS after NAT in patients with triple-negative IDC and a DCIS component.

References Powered by Scopus

Insights into molecular classifications of triple-negative breast cancer: Improving patient selection for treatment

948Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular alterations in triple-negative breast cancer—the road to new treatment strategies

666Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiclonal Invasion in Breast Tumors Identified by Topographic Single Cell Sequencing

311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, S., Liang, L., Huang, Z., Teng, Y., & Xing, W. (2025). Does concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ influence the prognostic outcome after neoadjuvant therapy in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma? World Journal of Surgical Oncology , 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03753-x

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free