Analysis of scientific collaboration network of Italian Institute of Technology

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It has been proven that collaboration between authors leads to a positive influence on research. This paper aims to analyse the complex structure of the co-authorship network among researchers of the Italian Institute of Technology. In this paper, we examine two different co-authorship networks created starting from the data of the papers published by the Italian Institute of Technology during the period 2006–2019. We apply the main Social Network Analysis techniques to describe the relational structure of the group of researchers and its evolution over time. The structure and characteristics of the networks are analysed both at macro and micro levels, and an attempt is made to identify a possible relationship between the position of researchers in the graphs and their scientific productivity and quality.

References Powered by Scopus

Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks

34509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emergence of scaling in random networks

29062Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification

12727Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Does the author's collaboration mode lead to papers' different citation impacts? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Co-Authorship Networks Analysis to Discover Collaboration Patterns among Italian Researchers

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The greatest co-authorships of finance theory literature (1896–2006): scientometrics based on complex networks

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

di Bella, E., Gandullia, L., & Preti, S. (2021). Analysis of scientific collaboration network of Italian Institute of Technology. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8517–8539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04120-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 6

67%

Computer Science 1

11%

Chemistry 1

11%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free