A comparison of knowledge extraction tools for the semantic web

124Citations
Citations of this article
216Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the last years, basic NLP tasks: NER, WSD, relation extraction, etc. have been configured for Semantic Web tasks including ontology learning, linked data population, entity resolution, NL querying to linked data, etc. Some assessment of the state of art of existing Knowledge Extraction (KE) tools when applied to the Semantic Web is then desirable. In this paper we describe a landscape analysis of several tools, either conceived specifically for KE on the Semantic Web, or adaptable to it, or even acting as aggregators of extracted data from other tools. Our aim is to assess the currently available capabilities against a rich palette of ontology design constructs, focusing specifically on the actual semantic reusability of KE output. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

References Powered by Scopus

A survey of named entity recognition and classification

2011Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data

1813Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Word sense disambiguation: A survey

1468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analysis of named entity recognition and linking for tweets

299Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semantic Web Machine Reading with FRED

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gangemi, A. (2013). A comparison of knowledge extraction tools for the semantic web. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7882 LNCS, pp. 351–366). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_24

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 135

71%

Researcher 36

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 153

86%

Engineering 11

6%

Social Sciences 7

4%

Linguistics 6

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free