Fluid management in ARDS: An evaluation of current practice and the association between early diuretic use and hospital mortality

23Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and volume overload are associated with increased hospital mortality. Evidence supports conservative fluid management in ARDS, but whether current practice reflects the implementation of that evidence has not been described. This study reports the variability in contemporary fluid management for ICU patients with ARDS. We compared routine care to trial protocols and analyzed whether more conservative management with diuretic medications in contemporary, usual care is associated with outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in nine ICUs at two academic hospitals during 2016 and 2017. We included 234 adult patients with ARDS in an ICU at least 3 days after meeting moderate-severe ARDS criteria (PaO2:FIO2 ≤ 150). The primary exposure was any diuretic use in 48 to 72 h after meeting ARDS criteria. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Unadjusted statistical analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used. Results: In 48-72 h after meeting ARDS criteria, 116 patients (50%) received a diuretic. In-hospital mortality was lower in the group that received diuretics than in the group that did not (14% vs 25%; p = 0.025). At ARDS onset, both groups had similar Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and ICU fluid balances. During the first 48 h after ARDS, the diuretic group received less crystalloid fluid than the no diuretic group (median [inter-quartile range]: 1.2 L [0.2-2.8] vs 2.4 L [1.2-5.0]; p < 0.001), but both groups received more fluid from medications and nutrition than from crystalloid. At 48 h, the prevalence of volume overload (ICU fluid balance >10% of body weight) in each group was 16% and 25%(p = 0.09), respectively. During 48-72 h after ARDS, the overall prevalence of shock was 44% and similar across both groups. Central venous pressure was recorded in only 18% of patients. Adjusting for confounders, early diuretic use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality (AOR 0.46, 95%CI [0.22, 0.96]). Conclusions: In this sample of ARDS patients, volume overload was common, and early diuretic use was independently associated with lower hospital mortality. These findings support the importance of fluid management in ARDS and suggest opportunities for further study and implementation of conservative fluid strategies into usual care.

References Powered by Scopus

The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure

8553Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin definition

8458Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries

3953Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Individualized resuscitation strategy for septic shock formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

eARDS: A multi-center validation of an interpretable machine learning algorithm of early onset Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) among critically ill adults with COVID-19

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vasoactive Inotropic Score as a Prognostic Factor during (Cardio-) Respiratory ECMO

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seitz, K. P., Caldwell, E. S., & Hough, C. L. (2020). Fluid management in ARDS: An evaluation of current practice and the association between early diuretic use and hospital mortality. Journal of Intensive Care, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00496-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

79%

Researcher 4

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 25

66%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

18%

Computer Science 3

8%

Arts and Humanities 3

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 17

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free