Usability of hybridmedia services - PC and mobile applications compared

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim is to present results of a usability test of a prototype of a context-based personalized hybridmedia service for delivering product-specific information to consumers. We recorded participants' eye movements when they used the service either with a camera phone or with the web browser of a PC. The participants' task was to search for product-specific information from the food product database and test calculators by using both a PC and mobile user interface. Eye movements were measured by a head-mounted eye tracking system. Even though the completion of the tasks took longer when the participants used the mobile phone than when they used the PC, they could complete the tasks successfully with both interfaces. Provided that the barcode tag was not very small, taking pictures from the barcodes with a mobile phone was quite easy. Overall, the use of the service via the mobile phone provides a quite good alternative for the PC. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

References Powered by Scopus

Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols

1664Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seeing the whole in parts: Text summarization for web browsing on handheld devices

178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Introduction of usability testing of mobile devices

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laarni, J., Lähteenmäki, L., Kuosmanen, J., & Ravaja, N. (2007). Usability of hybridmedia services - PC and mobile applications compared. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4552 LNCS, pp. 918–925). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73110-8_101

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

57%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free