Protein or No Protein? Opportunities for DNA-Based Detection of Allergenic Foods

54Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In food allergy, a common immunological disease with a potentially severe outcome, a causative cure is not available. Correct ingredient labeling and risk assessment of unlabeled allergen cross-contact is a prerequisite for effective allergen avoidance. Specific and sensitive analytical methods, which allow for unequivocal identification and accurate quantification of allergenic components, are important tools in allergen risk management. Both protein- and DNA-based methods are in place and reveal pros and cons depending upon the application and individual analytical question. This perspective highlights relevant molecular aspects and discusses, especially, opportunities for the application of DNA-based methods for the detection of allergenic foods.

References Powered by Scopus

ICON: Food allergy

544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The epidemiology of food allergy in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis

442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Establishment of Reference Doses for residues of allergenic foods: Report of the VITAL Expert Panel

245Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Are current analytical methods suitable to verify VITAL® 2.0/3.0 allergen reference doses for EU allergens in foods?

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seafood allergy: Occurrence, mechanisms and measures

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nano-biosensing platforms for detection of cow’s milk allergens: An overview

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holzhauser, T. (2018). Protein or No Protein? Opportunities for DNA-Based Detection of Allergenic Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 66(38), 9889–9894. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03657

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Researcher 5

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

50%

Chemistry 5

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

7%

Engineering 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0