Evaluation of diphenhydramine as a sedative for dogs

20Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective - To determine and compare levels of sedation achieved by IM administration of diphenhydramine, saline (0.9% NaCl) solution, and acepromazine in dogs. Design - Prospective randomized study. Animals-56 dogs. Procedure - Dogs were randomly assigned to receive diphenhydramine at 2, 4, or 8 mg/kg (0.9, 1.8, or 3.6 mg/lb, respectively) IM; acepromazine at 0.1 mg/kg (0.05 mg/lb) IM; or saline solution at 0.05 mL/kg (0.02 mL/lb) IM. Sedation was assessed by use of a 6-category descriptive system based on observation and interaction. Results - Dogs in the acepromazine group had significantly higher sedation scores than did dogs in the saline solution or diphenhydramine groups at 30 minutes. Dogs in the diphenhydramine groups did not have significantly different sedation scores from dogs in the saline solution group at any time point. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Diphenhydramine did not cause clinically appreciable sedation in healthy dogs. Diphenhydramine is not suitable as a sole sedative prior to general anesthesia in dogs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hofmeister, E. H., & Egger, C. M. (2005). Evaluation of diphenhydramine as a sedative for dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 226(7), 1092–1094. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.226.1092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free