Greenhouse Gas Disclosure: Evidence from Private Firms

0Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Existing literature on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disclosure has paid little attention to private firms, despite the fact that this type of firm is responsible for significant GHG emissions. This study empirically analyzes the GHG disclosure of German private firms. The results suggest that more pronounced information asymmetries due to a more dispersed ownership structure and/or multiple bank relationships are associated with more extensive GHG disclosure. This aligns with arguments from agency and stakeholder theory. While this result is not new for public firms, it is for private firms. Given the specific characteristics of this type of firms (no separation of ownership and control, private communication channels, close bank–borrower relationships), it is not a straightforward assumption that observations from public firms can be transferred to private firms one-to-one. Moreover, higher levels of actual GHG emissions are also associated with more GHG disclosure, indicating that legitimacy theory arguments hold for private firms as well.

References Powered by Scopus

Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting

2408Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Corporate social and environmental reporting A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure

2127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis

2122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grahn, A. (2024). Greenhouse Gas Disclosure: Evidence from Private Firms. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05697-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

42%

Researcher 5

42%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 10

77%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

15%

Arts and Humanities 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free