Classification of pancreaticobiliary maljunction and clinical features in children

48Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In 2015, the Committee on Diagnostic Criteria of the Japanese Study Group on Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction (PBM) proposed a classification of PBM into four types: (A) stenotic type, (B) non-stenotic type, (C) dilated channel type, and (D) complex type. To validate this classification and clarify the clinical features of the four types of PBM, a retrospective multicenter study was conducted. Methods: The study group of 317 children with PBM was divided into the four types of PBM. Clinical features, preoperative complications, operations, and postoperative pancreatic complications were evaluated. Results: All patients underwent excision of the extrahepatic bile duct. In type A, the age was younger and there was a higher incidence of cystic dilatation. Non-dilatation of the common bile duct was frequently seen in type B. Abdominal pain with hyperamylasemia was frequently seen in types B and C. In particular, the incidence of protein plugs and biliary perforation was high in type C (56.1% and 14.3%, respectively). The overall incidence of acute pancreatitis was 7.3%. Pancreatitis after excisional surgery was rare in the children in this study. Two patients with type D (0.6%) developed chronic pancreatitis postoperatively. Conclusions: This proposed classification is simple and correlates well with clinical features.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urushihara, N., Hamada, Y., Kamisawa, T., Fujii, H., Koshinaga, T., Morotomi, Y., … Ando, H. (2017). Classification of pancreaticobiliary maljunction and clinical features in children. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 24(8), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.485

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

29%

Researcher 3

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

89%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0