Selective elimination of breast cancer surgery in exceptional responders: Historical perspective and current trials

111Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With improvements in chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and our fundamental understanding of the relationship of tumor subtype and pathologic complete response (pCR), there has been dramatic improvement in pCR rates in the past decade, especially among triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancers. Rates of pCR in these groups of patients can be in the 60 % range and thus question the paradigm for the necessity of breast and nodal surgery in all cases, particularly when the patient will be receiving adjuvant local therapy with radiotherapy. Current practice for patients who respond well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is often to proceed with the same breast and axillary procedures as would have been offered women who had not received NCT, regardless of the apparent clinical response. Given these high response rates in defined subgroups among exceptional responders it is appropriate to question whether surgery is now a redundant procedure in their overall management. Further, definitive radiation without surgical resection with or without systemic therapy has been proven effective for several other malignant disease sites including some stages of esophageal, anal, laryngeal, prostate, cervical, and lung carcinoma. The main impediments for potential elimination of surgery have been the fact that prior and current standard and functional breast imaging methods are incapable of accurate prediction of residual disease and that integrating percutaneous biopsy of the breast primary and nodes following NCT may circumvent this issue. This article highlights historical attempts at omission of surgery following NCT in an earlier era, the current status of breast and nodal imaging to predict residual carcinoma, and ongoing and planned trials designed to identify appropriate patients who might be selected for clinical trials designed to test the safety of selected elimination of breast cancer surgery in percutaneous image-guided biopsy-proven exceptional responders to NCT.

References Powered by Scopus

Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

2363Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): A randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

1992Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

1210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Breast MRI: State of the art

555Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identification of patients with documented pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for omission of axillary surgery

172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The clinical significance of breast-only and node-only pathologic complete response (PCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): A review of 20,000 breast cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB)

152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van la Parra, R. F. D., & Kuerer, H. M. (2016). Selective elimination of breast cancer surgery in exceptional responders: Historical perspective and current trials. Breast Cancer Research. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13058-016-0684-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

64%

Researcher 16

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 72

87%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

5%

Computer Science 2

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 698

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free