Three-dimensional reconstruction of prostate cancer architecture with serial immunohistochemical sections: hallmarks of tumour growth, tumour compartmentalisation, and implications for grading and heterogeneity

21Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: Conventional morphology of prostate cancer considers only the two-dimensional (2D) architecture of the tumour. Our aim was to examine the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of tumour morphology based on multiple consecutive histological sections and to decipher relevant features of prostate cancer architecture. Methods and results: Seventy-five consecutive histological sections (5 μm) of a typical prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7) were immunostained (pan-cytokeratin) and scanned for further 3D reconstructions with fiji/imagej software. The main findings related to the prostate cancer architecture in this case were: (i) continuity of all glands, with the tumour being an integrated system, even in Gleason pattern 4 with poorly formed glands—no short-range migration of cells by Gleason pattern 4 (poorly formed glands); (ii) no repeated interconnections between the glands, with a tumour building a tree-like branched structure with very ‘plastic’ branches (maximal depth of investigation 375 μm); (iii) very stark compartmentalisation of the tumour related to extensive branching, the coexistence of independent terminal units of such branches in one 2D slice explaining intratumoral heterogeneity; (iv) evidence of a craniocaudal growth direction in interglandular regions of the prostate and for a lateromedial growth direction in subcapsular posterolateral regions; and (v) a 3D architecture-based description of Gleason pattern 4 with poorly formed glands, and its continuum with Gleason pattern 3. Conclusions: Consecutive histological sections provide high-quality material for 3D reconstructions of the tumour architecture, with excellent resolution. The reconstruction of multiple regions in this typical case of a Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 tumour provides insights into relevant aspects of tumour growth, the continuity of Gleason patterns 3 and 4, and tumour heterogeneity.

References Powered by Scopus

The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer

1122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes

1028Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer

376Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

High-accuracy prostate cancer pathology using deep learning

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

X-ray Micro-Computed Tomography for Nondestructive Three-Dimensional (3D) X-ray Histology

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification via Nondestructive 3D Pathology with Deep Learning–Assisted Gland Analysis

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tolkach, Y., Thomann, S., & Kristiansen, G. (2018). Three-dimensional reconstruction of prostate cancer architecture with serial immunohistochemical sections: hallmarks of tumour growth, tumour compartmentalisation, and implications for grading and heterogeneity. Histopathology, 72(6), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13467

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

58%

Researcher 5

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free