MAPTree: Beating “Optimal” Decision Trees with Bayesian Decision Trees

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Decision trees remain one of the most popular machine learning models today, largely due to their out-of-the-box performance and interpretability. In this work, we present a Bayesian approach to decision tree induction via maximum a posteriori inference of a posterior distribution over trees. We first demonstrate a connection between maximum a posteriori inference of decision trees and AND/OR search. Using this connection, we propose an AND/OR search algorithm, dubbed MAPTree, which is able to recover the maximum a posteriori tree. Lastly, we demonstrate the empirical performance of the maximum a posteriori tree both on synthetic data and in real world settings. On 16 real world datasets, MAPTree either outperforms baselines or demonstrates comparable performance but with much smaller trees. On a synthetic dataset, MAPTree also demonstrates greater robustness to noise and better generalization than existing approaches. Finally, MAPTree recovers the maxiumum a posteriori tree faster than existing sampling approaches and, in contrast with those algorithms, is able to provide a certificate of optimality. The code for our experiments is available at https://github.com/ThrunGroup/maptree.

References Powered by Scopus

Random forests

94890Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system

32590Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Induction of Decision Trees

15547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sullivan, C., Tiwari, M., & Thrun, S. (2024). MAPTree: Beating “Optimal” Decision Trees with Bayesian Decision Trees. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 38, pp. 9019–9026). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i8.28751

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

75%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free