NGC 1866: A workbench for stellar evolution

40Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

NGC 1866 is a young, rich star cluster in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Since the cluster is very well populated both in the main sequence and post main sequence stages, thus providing us with a statistically complete sample of objects throughout the various evolutionary phases of intermediate mass stars, it represents a good laboratory for testing stellar evolutionary models. More precisely, NGC 1866 can be used to discriminate among classical stellar models, in which the extension of the convective regions is fixed by the classical Schwarzschild criterion, from models with overshooting, in which an "extra-mixing" is considered to take place beyond the classical limit of the convective zone. Addressing this subject in a recent work, Testa et al. (1999) reached the conclusion that the classical scheme for the treatment of convection represents a good and sufficient approximation for convective interiors. Using their own data, we repeat here the analysis. First we revise the procedure followed by Testa et al. (1999) to correct the data for completeness, second we calculate new stellar models with updated physical input for both evolutionary schemes, finally we present many simulations of the colour-magnitude diagrams and luminosity functions of the cluster using the ratio of the integrated luminosity function of main sequence stars to the number of giants as the normalization factor of the simulations. We also take into account several possible physical agents that could alter the color-magnitude diagram and the luminosity function: they are unresolved binary stars, dispersion in the age, stochastic effects in the initial mass function. Their effect is analyzed separately, with the conclusion that binary stars have the largest impact. The main result of this study is that the convective overshoot hypothesis (together with a suitable percentage of unresolved binaries) is really needed to fully match the whole pattern of data. The main drawback of the classical models is that they cannot reproduce the correct ratio of main sequence to post-main sequence stars.

References Powered by Scopus

Evolutionary tracks and isochrones for low- and intermediate-mass stars: From 0.15 to 7 M<inf>⊙</inf>, and from Z = 0.0004 to 0.03

2172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effective temperature scale of giant stars (F0-K5). II. Empirical calibration of T<inf>eff</inf> versus colours and [Fe/H]

845Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stellar turbulent convection: A new model and applications

497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A large stellar evolution database for population synthesis studies. I. Scaled solar models and isochrones

1170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theoretical isochrones in several photometric systems I. Johnson-Cousins-Glass, HST/WFPC2, HST/NICMOS, Washington, and ESO imaging survey filter sets

1018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Star counts in the galaxy simulating from very deep to very shallow photometric surveys with the TRILEGAL code

562Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barmina, R., Girardi, L., & Chiosi, C. (2002). NGC 1866: A workbench for stellar evolution. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 385(3), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020197

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 6

86%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free