Analyzing cosmological perturbations using the covariant approach

  • Hwang J
  • Vishniac E
87Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a complete set of equations using the covariant approach to the linear analysis of cosmological perturbations in general relativity without fixing gauges and by using gauge-invariant variables. In addition, Hawking's (1966) analysis of the evolution of vorticity and Jackson's analysis of the density evolution equation are extended to include the effects of an imperfect fluid in exact covariant form. The error in Hawking's covariant analysis is corrected, and the result is compared with other approaches using different gauges. In addition, the Ellis and Bruni (1989) equations are extended to the case of an imperfect fluid. An explicit solution for the evolution of large-scale cosmological density perturbations is presented, assuming a perfect fluid, but making no other restrictions on the background cosmological model.

References Powered by Scopus

Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations

2055Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe

1938Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A causal relativistic theory

1052Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Theory of cosmological perturbations

3024Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity: Perfect fluid cosmologies

290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cosmological perturbations and the physical meaning of gauge-invariant variables

212Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hwang, J.-C., & Vishniac, E. T. (1990). Analyzing cosmological perturbations using the covariant approach. The Astrophysical Journal, 353, 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/168583

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

38%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Researcher 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 8

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free