Preferred Reporting items for OBservational studies in Endodontics (PROBE) guidelines: a development protocol

15Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Observational studies have a significant role in establishing the prevalence and incidence of diseases in populations, as well as determining the benefits and risks associated with health-related interventions. Observational studies principally encompass cohort, case–control, case series and cross-sectional designs. Inadequate reporting of observational studies is likely to have a negative impact on decision-making in day-to-day clinical practice; however, no reporting guidelines have been published for observational studies in Endodontics. The aim of this project is to develop reporting guidelines for authors when creating manuscripts describing observational studies in the field of Endodontology in an attempt to improve the quality of publications. The new guidelines for observational studies will be named: ‘Preferred Reporting items for OBservational studies in Endodontics (PROBE)’. A steering committee was formed by the project leaders (PD, VN) to develop the guidelines through a five-phase consensus process. The steering committee will review and adapt items from the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement and the Clinical and Laboratory Images in Publications (CLIP) principles, as well as identify new items that add value to Endodontics. The steering committee will create a PROBE Delphi Group (PDG), consisting of 30 members across the globe to review and refine the draft checklist items and flowchart. The items will be assessed by the PDG on a nine-point Likert scale for relevance and inclusion. The agreed items will then be discussed by a PROBE Face-to-Face meeting group (PFMG) made up of 20 individuals to further refine the guidelines. After receiving feedback from the PFMG, the steering committee will pilot and finalize the guidelines. The approved PROBE guidelines will be disseminated through publication in relevant journals, and be presented at national and international conferences. The PROBE checklist and flowchart will be available and downloadable from the Preferred Reporting Items for study Designs in Endodontics (PRIDE) website: www.pride-endodonticguidelines.org. The PROBE steering committee encourages clinicians, researchers, editors and peer reviewers to provide feedback on the PROBE guidelines to inform the steering group when the guidelines are updated.

References Powered by Scopus

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

9697Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research

2740Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration

1906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prevalence of Apical Periodontitis and Conventional Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment in General Adult Population: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies Published between 2012 and 2020

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in Endodontics: A consensus-based development study

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcome of single- versus two-visit root canal retreatment in teeth with periapical lesions: A randomized clinical trial

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagendrababu, V., Duncan, H. F., Fouad, A. F., Kirkevang, L. L., Parashos, P., Pigg, M., … Dummer, P. M. H. (2020, September 1). Preferred Reporting items for OBservational studies in Endodontics (PROBE) guidelines: a development protocol. International Endodontic Journal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13318

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

79%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

65%

Engineering 4

24%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0