Optimizing healthcare system by amalgamation of text processing and deep learning: a systematic review

1Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The explosion of clinical textual data has drawn the attention of researchers. Owing to the abundance of clinical data, it is becoming difficult for healthcare professionals to take real-time measures. The tools and methods are lacking when compared to the amount of clinical data generated every day. This review aims to survey the text processing pipeline with deep learning methods such as CNN, RNN, LSTM, and GRU in the healthcare domain and discuss various applications such as clinical concept detection and extraction, medically aware dialogue systems, sentiment analysis of drug reviews shared online, clinical trial matching, and pharmacovigilance. In addition, we highlighted the major challenges in deploying text processing with deep learning to clinical textual data and identified the scope of research in this domain. Furthermore, we have discussed various resources that can be used in the future to optimize the healthcare domain by amalgamating text processing and deep learning.

References Powered by Scopus

Long Short-Term Memory

76956Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation

11655Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Representation learning: A review and new perspectives

9848Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sentiment analysis in medication adherence: using ruled-based and artificial intelligence-driven algorithms to understand patient medication experiences

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rani, S., & Jain, A. (2024). Optimizing healthcare system by amalgamation of text processing and deep learning: a systematic review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(1), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15539-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

44%

Social Sciences 2

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

22%

Psychology 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free