The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in world of warcraft

222Citations
Citations of this article
271Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs) can be fascinating laboratories to observe group dynamics online. In particular, players must form persistent associations or "guilds" to coordinate their actions and accomplish the games' toughest objectives. Managing a guild, however, is notoriously difficult and many do not survive very long. In this paper, we examine some of the factors that could explain the success or failure of a game guild based on more than a year of data collected from five World of Warcraft servers. Our focus is on structural properties of these groups, as represented by their social networks and other variables. We use this data to discuss what games can teach us about group dynamics online and, in particular, what tools and techniques could be used to better support gaming communities. Copyright 2007 ACM.

References Powered by Scopus

An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs

2033Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft

530Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strangers and friends: Collaborative play in world of warcraft

334Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The scientific research potential of virtual worlds

675Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue

252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring cyberbullying and other toxic behavior in team competition online games

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. J. (2007). The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in world of warcraft. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 839–848). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240750

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 138

64%

Researcher 46

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 89

45%

Social Sciences 62

31%

Psychology 31

16%

Business, Management and Accounting 17

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free