A Randomized Open-Labeled Trial of Methotrexate as a Steroid-Sparing Agent for Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Two clinical trials assessing the steroid-sparing effect of methotrexate (MTX) yielded conflicting results. Our objective was to investigate whether MTX would show a steroid-sparing effect in the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) patients who fitted Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Class II and Class III. Methods: We performed an 18-month prospective, randomized, open-labeled trial of prednisone combined with MTX 10 mg orally every week versus prednisone alone in 40 recently diagnosed MG patients of MGFA Class II and Class III between July 2014 and July 2018. The primary endpoint was the prednisone area under the dose–time curve (AUDTC) from months 3 to 18. Secondary endpoints included changes of the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMG), the Myasthenia Gravis Activity of Daily Living Score (MG-ADL), initial time of prednisone reduction, the median prednisone daily dose in each month, adverse events, and treatment failures in each group. Results: Forty participants were included; among those, 5 individuals withdrew. A total of 35 participants completed 18 months of follow-up (18 in prednisone+MTX, 17 in prednisone group). Combined use of MTX reduced the month 3–18 prednisone AUDTC (prednisone+MTX 5,663.44 ± 1,678.08 mg, prednisone 6,683.94 ± 678.08 mg, p = 0.03, 95% confidence interval -1916.01 to -124.98). The initial times of prednisone reduction were 4.34 ± 1.44 months in the prednisone+MTX group and 5.56 ± 2.05 months in the prednisone group (p = 0.04, 95% CI -2.41 to -0.03). The median daily prednisone dose was significantly lower in the prednisone+MTX group at month 6 and months 9–18. No significant differences were found in QMG and MG-ADL scores between the two groups. No serious drug-related adverse events were observed in both groups. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that MTX has the steroid-sparing ability in generalized MG patients of MGFA Class II and Class III. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=10563 identifier ChiCTR-IPR-15006081.

References Powered by Scopus

Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

533Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A randomized double-blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis

425Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methotrexatehow does it really work?

359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Myasthenia gravis: Molecular mechanisms and promising therapeutic strategies

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Myasthenia gravis and five autoimmune diseases: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How I assess and treat a patient with auto-immune myasthenia

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di, L., Shen, F., Wen, X., Lu, Y., Zhu, W., Wang, M., & Da, Y. (2022). A Randomized Open-Labeled Trial of Methotrexate as a Steroid-Sparing Agent for Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. Frontiers in Immunology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.839075

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

67%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

17%

Neuroscience 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0