Qualitative study of barriers to clinical trial retention in adults with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes

8Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Regular physical exercise may preserve β cell function in newly diagnosed adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, clinical trials to test this theory require the recruitment and retention of adults with new-onset T1D, which can be challenging. We sought to determine the overall experiences of newly diagnosed adults with T1D in an exercise study, to understand issues that influence the retention of trial participants in such studies. Design Qualitative methodology using individual face-to-face (n=6) and telephone interviews (n=14). Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using the framework method. Setting The study took place at five participating UK hospitals. Participants Twenty participants, aged 19-55 years, in the Exercise for Type 1 Diabetes study were interviewed to explore their study experiences and identify motivators and deterrents towards the study. Participants in control and intervention arms were interviewed, as were people with T1D who had completed (n=16) and withdrawn (n=4). Results Participants revealed barriers and facilitators to retention; the majority were generalisable to clinical trials of people with newly diagnosed T1D. Coming to terms with a diagnosis of T1D, lack of time, work pressures, level of health professional support, volume, clarity and consistency of information and feedback and a desire for knowledge about their condition were all cited as influencing factors to trial retention. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to examine the experience of being involved in an exercise trial by people with T1D. Findings suggest appointments could be shorter, available outside of working hours and planned longer in advance; study information should be clear, consistent and in electronic and paper formats; questionnaires need minimising; healthcare support and feedback needs providing regularly; thought is required around how to support non-exercising arm participants. These considerations may improve participant retention rates in new-onset T1D studies.

References Powered by Scopus

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

6473Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Type 1 diabetes: New perspectives on disease pathogenesis and treatment

1236Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA<inf>1c</inf> levels in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

1016Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Applying mixed methods to pilot feasibility studies to inform intervention trials

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Virtual Clinical Trials: Perspectives in Dermatology

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring non-retention in clinical trials: A meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for drop out

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henshall, C., Narendran, P., Andrews, R. C., Daley, A., Stokes, K. A., Kennedy, A., & Greenfield, S. (2018). Qualitative study of barriers to clinical trial retention in adults with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. BMJ Open, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022353

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

55%

Researcher 15

34%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 15

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 15

41%

Social Sciences 4

11%

Psychology 3

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0