Derrida and the Flesh of Metaphorical Language

  • Lyngdoh S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, an attempt has been made to uncover the problem of metaphorical language in its relation to fleshliness and embodiedness as found in the critical reading of the texts of Derrida. The fleshliness of metaphorical language is embodied in our bodily activity in such a manner that sensible writing in the Derridean sense and corporeal body become intertwined no-tions. Metaphor and metaphorical language is a point of intersection between the body and sensible writing. This materiality/corporeality/fleshiness of me-taphorical language can be understood as text. According to Derrida, writing and body have been viewed by the western philosophical tradition as exterior to speech and mind respectively, and he wants to deconstruct such hierar-chical binaries. With this, writing (as archi-écriture) is no more a literary no-tion, but the generic form of symbolic practice, always already metaphorical and embodied. This paper is centered on the oeuvre of Derrida to uncover the thinking for the fleshliness of metaphorical language from within the texts of western philosophical tradition.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lyngdoh, S. S. (2021). Derrida and the Flesh of Metaphorical Language. Open Journal of Philosophy, 11(04), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2021.114031

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Mathematics 1

25%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0