Transformation of ground vibration signal for debris-flow monitoring and detection in alarm systems

33Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Debris flows are fast mass movements formed by a mix of water and solid materials, which occur in steep torrents, and are a source of high risks for human settlements. Geophones are widely used to detect the ground vibration induced by passing debris flows. However, the recording of geophone signals usually requires storing a huge amount of data, which leads to problems in storage capacity and power consumption. This paper presents a method to transform and simplify the signals measured by geophones. The key input parameter is the ground velocity threshold, which removes the seismic noise that is not related to debris flows. A signal conditioner was developed to implement the transformation and the ground velocity threshold was set by electrical resistors. The signal conditioner was installed at various European monitoring sites to test the method. Results show that data amount and power consumption can be greatly reduced without losing much information on the main features of the debris flows. However, the outcome stresses the importance of choosing a ground vibration threshold, which must be accurately calibrated. The transformation is also suitable to detect other rapid mass movements and to distinguish among different processes, which points to a possible implementation in alarm systems. © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Factors affecting the ground vibration signal: characteristics of transmission medium between geophone and flow path. The transmission medium can be bedrock (a) or colluvium (b). The location of geophones is indicated by a circle; while the flow direction, is expressed by an arrow.
  • Figure 2. Factors affecting the ground vibration signal: assembly of sensors: (a) geophone fixed inside a metal sheet box (a signal conditioner can also be seen in the box), (b) fixed directly on the bedrock, and, (c) nailed down in the soil. Normally the geophone is additionally protected from the rainfall or hailing.
  • Figure 3. Transformation of the geophone signal (thick line) into a pulse signal (thin line) by the signal conditioner using a previously defined threshold value (dashed red line).
  • Figure 4. Simplified diagram of the signal conditioner and its interaction with the datalogger and the geophone.
  • Figure 5. Common threshold values of the monitoring stations in the Pyrenees and the Swiss Alps (indicated by dots), linearly dependent on value R11. Values of ground vibration velocity peaks (dashed grey lines) and thresholds (black continuous line) are given for comparison (see text for detailed explanation on each value).
  • Figure 7. Location of the geophones in the three sites (a) Illgraben torrent (Swiss Alps), (b) Rebaixader torrent (Central Pyrenees, Spain), (c) Dorfbach torrent (Swiss Alps).
  • Table 1. Main characteristics of the location of the geophones analyzed in this work.
  • Figure 8. Data recorded in Illgraben during the event occurred in 27 July 2009. (a) Ground velocity signal (GVS) measured by geoCD27DIG (sample rate: 2 kHz) (b) Impulse per second (IS) time series obtained by post-processing geoCD27DIG data using the MATLAB code (thin line: 0.71 mm/s threshold, thick line: 6 mm/s threshold) (c) GVS measured by geoSoilDIG (sample rate: 2 kHz). (d) IS time series obtained by post-processing geoSoilDIG data using the MATLAB code (0.71 mm/s threshold) (e) IS time series measured at geoCD27IMP applying the transformation by the signal conditioner (0.71 mm/s threshold).

References Powered by Scopus

Ten years of debris-flow monitoring in the Moscardo Torrent (Italian Alps)

279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Field and monitoring data of debris-flow events in the Swiss Alps

250Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Field observations of a debris flow event in the Dolomites

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Debris-flow monitoring and warning: Review and examples

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Results and experiences gathered at the Rebaixader debris-flow monitoring site, Central Pyrenees, Spain

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seismic Characterization of Debris Flows: Insights into Energy Radiation and Implications for Warning

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abancó, C., Hürlimann, M., Fritschi, B., Graf, C., & Moya, J. (2012). Transformation of ground vibration signal for debris-flow monitoring and detection in alarm systems. Sensors, 12(4), 4870–4891. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120404870

Readers over time

‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

41%

Researcher 14

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 18

50%

Engineering 11

31%

Environmental Science 4

11%

Sports and Recreations 3

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0