Prescriber Perspectives on Biosimilar Adoption and Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology: A Workshop Summary

8Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The approval and adoption of biosimilar products are essential to contain increasing healthcare costs and provide more affordable choices for patients. Despite steady progress in the number of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) biosimilar approvals over the years, biosimilar adoption in the United States has been slow and gradual, largely driven by payers rather than clinicians. In order to better understand the barriers to biosimilar adoption in the clinic, the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) and the FDA jointly hosted a virtual workshop on April 13, 2022, titled “Biosimilars: A Decade of Experience and Future Directions – Strategies for Improving Biosimilar Adoption and the Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology.” This summary documents the experiences of four leading academic clinicians with specialties in oncology, rheumatology, gastroenterology, and endocrinology and their perspectives on how to increase biosimilar adoption, including the role of clinical pharmacology. Besides systemic changes in pricing and reimbursement, there is a need for additional education of a broad range of providers, including advanced care practitioners, and patients themselves. Educational efforts highlighting the rigor of the studies that support the approval of biosimilars—including the clinical pharmacology studies—and the benefits of biosimilars, can play a major role in improving biosimilar acceptance.

References Powered by Scopus

Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during longterm follow-up

695Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

684Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: The PLANETRA study

586Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Biosimilars in IBD: What Every Clinician Needs to Know

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advancing Innovations in Biosimilars

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Access to biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors for treatment of rheumatic diseases in the biosimilars era in Poland: a nation-level study

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shubow, S., Sun, Q., Nguyen Phan, A. L., Hammell, D. C., Kane, M., Lyman, G. H., … Wang, Y. M. (2023). Prescriber Perspectives on Biosimilar Adoption and Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology: A Workshop Summary. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 113(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2765

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 5

50%

Social Sciences 2

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

20%

Computer Science 1

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free