Tackling the plant proteome: Practical approaches, hurdles and experimental tools

271Citations
Citations of this article
330Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The study of complex biological questions through comparative proteomics is becoming increasingly attractive to plant biologists as the rapidly expanding plant genomic and expressed sequence tag databases provide improved opportunities for protein identification. This review focuses on practical issues associated with comparative proteomic analysis, including the challenges of effective protein extraction and separation from plant tissues, the pros and cons of two-dimensional gel-based analysis and the problems of identifying proteins from species that are not recognized models for functional genomic studies. Specific points are illustrated using data from an ongoing study of the tomato and pepper fruit proteomes.

References Powered by Scopus

Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome

19212Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana

7558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics

5953Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Proteomics: Technologies and their applications

730Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A universal and rapid protocol for protein extraction from recalcitrant plant tissues for proteomic analysis

477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots

452Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rose, J. K. C., Bashir, S., Giovannoni, J. J., Jahn, M. M., & Saravanan, R. S. (2004, September). Tackling the plant proteome: Practical approaches, hurdles and experimental tools. Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02182.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 131

49%

Researcher 85

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 45

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 222

82%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 36

13%

Chemistry 10

4%

Engineering 4

1%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free