Conceptualizing Space Actors: State and Power in Space

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter sets forth a comprehensive, cross-disciplinary conceptual framework aimed at a dynamic comparison of space actors, taking into account their technical, industrial and political characteristics as well as the trajectories that bring them in or take them out of ‘the club’ of space powers. It contends that space power is a form of state power. It also argues that to acquire the status of space power, a state must possess a certain degree of spacepower, a multidimensional concept comprising two main attributes: capacity and autonomy. Autonomy refers to the state’s ability to formulate space-related interests of its own and devise national space strategies independent from or against the will of divergent interests both foreign and domestic. Capacity relates to the state’s ability to pursue those interests and implement its strategies in the political, diplomatic, military, economic, or social realms. The combination of these two dimensions results in a multi-fold typology of space actors, which consists of space powers, emerging space nations, and spacefaring nations. The latter group is then further divided into three distinct subgroups: skilled spacefaring nations, self-reliant spacefaring nations, and primed spacefaring nations.

References Powered by Scopus

Who gives foreign aid to whom and why?

1587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens

1493Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regulatory capture: A review

594Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aliberti, M., Cappelli, O., & Praino, R. (2023). Conceptualizing Space Actors: State and Power in Space. In Studies in Space Policy (Vol. 35, pp. 9–72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32871-8_2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free