Oportunidades de investigación en preeclampsia, desde la perspectiva de prevención primaria. Un artículo de reflexión

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: this essay presents some research fields in which (from a preventative perspective) advanced, qualified and appropriate research must be carried out and interventions made for clarifying doubts or gaps concerning preeclampsia to reduce its impact on our target population. Facts: inconsistencies in the available information arise in some areas concerning preeclampsia incidence, associated risk-factors, short- and long-term consequences in preeclampsia patients or their siblings, pregnant females' perception of preeclampsia and the efficacy of many proposed population prevention measures. Conclusions: such deficiencies can be more efficiently resolved by linking pathophysiological knowledge of preeclampsia with research and intervention strategies in epidemiology and public health.

References Powered by Scopus

Pre-eclampsia

2831Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preeclampsia: An excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy

1393Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth

1123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy Intelligent System for Patients with Preeclampsia in Wearable Devices

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The prognosis for children of mothers with preeclampsia. Part 2: Long-term effects

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intergenic period as a risk factor for the development of preeclampsia

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Díaz-Martínez, L. A., & Serrano-Díaz, N. C. (2008). Oportunidades de investigación en preeclampsia, desde la perspectiva de prevención primaria. Un artículo de reflexión. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, 59(3), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.405

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2200.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

73%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

27%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0