Transient Inhibition of FGFR2b-Ligands Signaling Leads to Irreversible Loss of Cellular β-Catenin Organization and Signaling in AER during Mouse Limb Development

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The vertebrate limbs develop through coordinated series of inductive, growth and patterning events. Fibroblast Growth Factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b) signaling controls the induction of the Apical Ectodermal Ridge (AER) but its putative roles in limb outgrowth and patterning, as well as in AER morphology and cell behavior have remained unclear. We have investigated these roles through graded and reversible expression of soluble dominant-negative FGFR2b molecules at various times during mouse limb development, using a doxycycline/transactivator/tet(O)-responsive system. Transient attenuation (≤24 hours) of FGFR2b-ligands signaling at E8.5, prior to limb bud induction, leads mostly to the loss or truncation of proximal skeletal elements with less severe impact on distal elements. Attenuation from E9.5 onwards, however, has an irreversible effect on the stability of the AER, resulting in a progressive loss of distal limb skeletal elements. The primary consequences of FGFR2b-ligands attenuation is a transient loss of cell adhesion and down-regulation of P63, β1-integrin and E-cadherin, and a permanent loss of cellular β-catenin organization and WNT signaling within the AER. Combined, these effects lead to the progressive transformation of the AER cells from pluristratified to squamous epithelial-like cells within 24 hours of doxycycline administration. These findings show that FGFR2b-ligands signaling has critical stage-specific roles in maintaining the AER during limb development. © 2013 Danopoulos et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Signaling induced by FGFR2b-ligands interactioncontrols progressive limb growth along the proximal-distal axis. Pregnant females carrying [R26rtTA/+;Tg/+] double transgenic (DTG) embryos and single transgenic [R26rtTA/+ or Tg/+] control embryos were treated continuously with Doxycycline food starting at different developmental stages; (A,B) Treatment at E8.5, before limb induction: loss of both hindlimbs and forelimbs in E13.5 DTG embryos. (C,D) Treatment at E10.5, after limb bud induction: Formation of rudimentary forelimbs and almost complete absence of hindlimbs in E14.5 DTG embryos. (E–F) Treatment at E11.5: Absence of autopod in both hindlimbs and forelimbs of E13.5 DTG embryos. (G) Dissected hindlimbs in DTG and controls shown in (E,F). (H–I) Treatment at E13.0: control (H) and DTG (I) embryos at E16. Note that the Topgal allele was introduced in DTG and control embryos to visualize the extent of mesenchymal condensation in the limb. (J,K) Dissected left hindlimbs from embryos shown in H and I displaying failure of separation of the digits in DTG hindlimb. (L–O) Treatment at E13.5: truncation of the digits in both forelimbs and hindlimbs. (P–S) Alcian blue/alizarin red staining indicates the reduction in the size of the P3 phalange in the forelimb and complete loss of the P3 phalange in the hindlimb of DTG embryos treated from E13.5 to E16.5. d, digits; p, phalanges. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g001
  • Figure 2. Transient attenuation of FGFR2b-ligands signaling, before and after limb bud induction, affects different skeletal elements along the A/P axis. Alcian blue/alizarin red staining of embryos was used to visualize the bone versus cartilage respectively. Images of E18.5 embryos which were exposed to Dox at E8.5 (A–D), E9.5 (E–F), E10.5 (G,H) and E11.5 (I–J). Hindlimbs demonstrate more drastic defects than forelimbs. Also, homozygous vs. heterozygous embryos and right vs. left limbs are differently affected. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g002
  • Figure 3. Dynamics of soluble Fgfr2b expression and impact on AER maintenance after a single Dox-IP injection. (A) Embryos were collected at 0.5, 1,2,4,6,12 and 24 hrs after Dox IP at E11. (B) Schematic of the soluble Fgfr2b structure indicating the position of the specific primers P1 and P2 used to detect sFgfr2b expression. (C) Quantification of soluble Fgfr2b by qRT-PCR indicating a peak of expression at 6 hrs and a steep decrease at 24 hrs. (D) Analysis of the AER at these different time points showing a progressive diseappearance of the AER. (E) Western blot from whole E11 embryos exposed to Dox at different time points. Significant decrease in P-ERK levels is observed after 4 hrs. (F) Quantification of the PERK/Total ERK ratio at the different time points. (G) BEK (FGFR2) expression by IHC indicating that FGFR2 is still expressed in the rudimentary AER at 24 hrs post Dox-IP. (H) qRT-PCR for endogenous Fgfr2b expression supporting the IHC results. Scale bar D: 50 mm; G-upper panels: 50 mm; G-lower panels: 25 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g003
  • Figure 4. Expression of Fgf8 in the AER following Dox-IP. (A–F) WMISH for Fgf8 in control (A,B), Rosa26rtTA/rtTA; Tg/Tg embryo after 1 hour DoxIP injection (C,D) and 2 hours after Dox-IP injection (E,F). B,D,F are high magnification of A,C,E. (C,D) Fgf8-AER expression is decreased at 1 hour after Dox-IP injection. (inset in D) Close up examination of the limb shows that the AER is detaching. (E,F) Fgf8-AER is significantly expressed 2 hours after Dox-IP injection. However, note that the expression at 2 hours is still lower than the one observed in the control and still exhibits gaps in Fgf8 expression indicating defective AER at this time point. (B9–B90,D9–D90,F9–F90) SEM images of control (B9–B0), 1 hour Dox-IP (D9–D0) and 2 hours DoxIP (F9–F0) embryos showing that the AER is still present at 1 and 2 hrs after Dox-IP. (G,H) Fgf8 expression at 24 hrs post Dox-IP showing complete absence of Fgf8 expression in the hindlimb and a residual expression in the forelimb. (K) Quantification of Fgf8 expression by qRT-PCR in the forelimbs at different times post Dox-IP. Note that Fgf8 expression is still present at 1 hr post Dox-IP supporting the hypothesis that the lack of Fgf8 expression at 1 Dox-IP by WMISH is due to the physical loss of the AER. Scale bar A,C,E,G,I: 500 mm; B,D,F,H,J: 300 mm; B9,D9,F9: 100 mm; B0,D0,F0: 50 mm; B90,D90,F90: 10 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g004
  • Figure 5. Cell adhesion and cell death are reduced in the AER after attenuation of FGFR2b-ligands signaling. Histology (A, D, G) and TEM (B, C, E, F, H, I) images of the AER at E11, E11+ 1 hr and E11+ 2 hrs post Dox-IP. (D) Note that at 1 hr the AER is spreading and no longer a compact pseudostratified epithelium like in the control (A). SEM analysis does not indicate major changes except for irregularly shaped nuclei. (G–I) after 2 hrs Dox-IP, the AER seemingly reformed as a compact structure (G) but SEM analysis indicated that the most superficial layer, the periderm is missing. (J– R) Cell-cell adhesion was tested by IF for b1-integrin (J,M,P), P63 (K,N,Q) and E-Cadherin (L,O,R) expression. b1-integrin expression is reduced in DTGAER 1 and 2 hours after Dox-IP (M, P) in comparison to the control AER at E11 (J). P63 expression is reduced in DTG-AER 1 hours after Dox-IP (N) compared to the control AER at E11 (K). No significant difference is observed at 2 hours after Dox-IP (Q) compared to the control AER. E-cadherin expression is reduced in DTG-AER 1 and 2 hours after Dox-IP (O,R) in comparison to the control AER at E11 (L). (U–W) TUNEL staining for control AER at E10.5 (U), DTG-AER 1 hour after Dox-IP (V) and 2 hours after Dox-IP (W) demonstrate reduction in cell death at 1 hour after Dox-IP in the DTG-AER. (S and T) Quantification by q-PCR of b1-integrin and P63 expression. Scale bar A,D,G: 25 mm; B,E,H: 5 mm; C,F,I: 2 mm; J–R: 20 mm; U–W: 20 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g005
  • Figure 6. FGFR2b-ligands signaling controls cell proliferation in the mesenchyme of the limb bud. (A–D) Phosphohistone H3 and Ecadherin double IF staining in control E11.5 (A,B) and DTG [R26rtTA/rtTA; Tg/Tg] (C,D) limb bud exposed to Dox-IP at E10.5 and analyzed at E11.5 demonstrate significant reduction in cell proliferation of both the AER and the adjacent mesenchyme. (E–H) Caspase 3 IF staining for cell death in control limb bud at E11.5 (E,F) and DTG (G,H) limb buds exposed to Dox-IP at E10.5 and analyzed at E11.5 display significant decrease in apoptosis of the rudimentary AER, there is no change in the apoptosis of the adjacent mesenchyme. (Adj mesenchyme = Adjacent mesenchyme). (I) Quantification of PHH3 positive cells. (J) Quantification of caspase 3 positive cells. Bars represent the mean 6 s.e.m. of at least 5 independent samples of each. Mann-whitney non-parametric test was performed. *p#0.05. Scale bar A–H: 50 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g006
  • Figure 7. Fate of the mesenchymal progenitors upon FGFR2b-ligands inactivation. (A–C) Quantification by qRT-PCR of Meis1, Hoxa11 and Hoxa13 expression in the developing forelimb at different time-points after Dox injection at E11. (D–U) WMISH at 0 hr (D–F; J–L; P–R) and 2 hours Dox-IP (G–I; M–O; S–U) for Meis1 (D–I), Hoxa11 (J–O) and Hoxa13 (P–U). Note the increase in the expression of proximal/stylopod progenitor marker Meis1 at the expense of the distal/autopod marker Hoxa13. Scale bars: D,J,P,G,M,S: 500 mm; E,F,K,L,Q,R,H,I,N,O,T,U: 300 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g007
  • Figure 8. Loss of canonical WNT signaling in the AER after attenuation of FGFR2b-ligands signaling. (A,B) Topgal, a WNT signaling reporter shows strong expression in the AER of both fore- and hind-limbs of the control embryos at E11. (C,F) Topgal expression is mostly lost in the AER of DTG embryos 1 hour (C,D) and 4 hrs (E,F) after Dox-IP injection at E11. (G–H) IF for the activated form of b-catenin in control (G) and DTG one hour after Dox-IP at E11 (H). Note the strong reduction in b-catenin positive cells in the AER and in the adjacent mesenchyme confirming the Topgal results. (I) Quantification of G and H. Bars represent the mean 6 s.e.m. of at least 5 independent samples of each. Mann-Whitney non-parametric test was performed; *p#0.05. (J,K) WMISH for Dkk1 indicating robust up-regulation of the WNT inhibitor 1 hour after Dox-IP (K) compared to the control limbs (J). Insets in J and K are corresponding vibratome cross sections through the limb focusing on the AER. (B,D,F are high magnification of A,C,E respectively). (L–P) Quantification by qRT-PCR of Dkk1 (L), Wnt3 (M), Wnt3a (N), Axin2 (O) and Fgf10 (P) at different time points after single Dox-IP injection at E11. h, hindimb; f, forelimb. Scale bar A,C: 170 mm; B,D,H,I: 50 mm; E,F: 50 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076248.g008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Danopoulos, S., Parsa, S., Al Alam, D., Tabatabai, R., Baptista, S., Tiozzo, C., … Bellusci, S. (2013). Transient Inhibition of FGFR2b-Ligands Signaling Leads to Irreversible Loss of Cellular β-Catenin Organization and Signaling in AER during Mouse Limb Development. PLoS ONE, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076248

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

75%

Researcher 5

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

42%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

35%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

19%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0