Corrigendum: Combined Effects of Parenting in Childhood and Resilience on Work Stress in Nonclinical Adult Workers From the Community (Front. Psychiatry, (2020), 11, (776), 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00776)

Abstract

In the original article, the legends for Figures 1 and 2 were swapped. Figure 1. Structural equation model of parental care (PBI), resilience (CD-RISC), perceived job stressors (BJSQ), and PPSR (BJSQ). Solid arrows indicate increased effects, dotted arrows indicate decreased effects, and a thin dotted line indicates a nonsignificant effect. Coefficients beside the lines are standardized. The latent variable “care” consists of paternal and maternal care. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. Figure 2. Structural equation model of parental overprotection (PBI), resilience (CD-RISC), perceived job stressors (BJSQ), and PPSR (BJSQ). Solid arrows indicate increased effects and dotted arrows indicate decreased effects. Coefficients beside the lines are standardized. The latent variable “overprotection” consists of both paternal and maternal overprotection (OP). PBI, Parental Bonding Instrument; CD-RISC, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; BJSQ, Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. In the original article, there was an error. The quoted variables fromthe figure were wrong in the Results section. A correction has been made to Results, Structural Equation Model, paragraphs 2 and 4: Model 1 for the latent variable of “parental overprotection” is shown in Figure 2 and the results are also shown in Table 2. The fit indices of thismodel indicated a good fit (RMSEA=0.012 and CFI = 1.000). The R2 for PPSR was 0.273, indicating that this model explains 27.3% of the variability in the PPSR scores. Paternal overprotection and maternal overprotection contributed to the latent variable of “overprotection” to the same degree, as shown in Figure 2. Parental overprotection in childhood directly increased perceived job stressors and PPSR, and directly reduced resilience. Resilience directly reduced perceived job stressors and PPSR. Model 2 for the latent variable of “parental care” is shown in Figure 1, and the results are also shown in Table 3. The fit indices of this model indicated a good fit (RMSEA = 0.000 and CFI = 1.000). The R2 for PPSR was 0.255, indicating that this model explains 25.5% of the variability in PPSR scores. Maternal care contributed to the latent variable of “care” in Figure 1 more than paternal care. Parental care in childhood directly decreased PPSR and directly increased resilience. The effect of parental care on perceived job stressors was not statistically significant. Resilience directly reduced perceived job stressors and PPSR. The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.