Applying a network framework to the neurobiology of reading and dyslexia

50Citations
Citations of this article
163Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is a substantial literature on the neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Differences are often described in terms of individual regions or individual cognitive processes. However, there is a growing appreciation that the brain areas subserving reading are nested within larger functional systems, and new network analysis methods may provide greater insight into how reading difficulty arises. Yet, relatively few studies have adopted a principled network-based approach (e.g., connectomics) to studying reading. In this study, we combine data from previous reading literature, connectomics studies, and original data to investigate the relationship between network architecture and reading. Methods: First, we detailed the distribution of reading-related areas across many resting-state networks using meta-analytic data from NeuroSynth. Then, we tested whether individual differences in modularity, the brain's tendency to segregate into resting-state networks, are related to reading skill. Finally, we determined whether brain areas that function atypically in dyslexia, as identified by previous meta-analyses, tend to be concentrated in hub regions. Results: We found that most resting-state networks contributed to the reading network, including those subserving domain-general cognitive skills such as attention and executive function. There was also a positive relationship between the global modularity of an individual's brain network and reading skill, with the visual, default mode and cingulo-opercular networks showing the highest correlations. Brain areas implicated in dyslexia were also significantly more likely to have a higher participation coefficient (connect to multiple resting-state networks) than other areas. Conclusions: These results contribute to the growing literature on the relationship between reading and brain network architecture. They suggest that an efficient network organization, i.e., one in which brain areas form cohesive resting-state networks, is important for skilled reading, and that dyslexia can be characterized by abnormal functioning of hub regions that map information between multiple systems. Overall, use of a connectomics framework opens up new possibilities for investigating reading difficulty, especially its commonalities across other neurodevelopmental disorders.

References Powered by Scopus

Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations

8637Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

FSL

8205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks

6907Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Disrupted Patterns of Rich-Club and Diverse-Club Organizations in Subjective Cognitive Decline and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reading intervention and neuroplasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of brain changes associated with reading intervention

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia and related disorders: A reappraisal of the temporal hypothesis, twenty years on

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bailey, S. K., Aboud, K. S., Nguyen, T. Q., & Cutting, L. E. (2018). Applying a network framework to the neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-018-9251-z

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 71

70%

Researcher 23

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 35

49%

Neuroscience 22

31%

Social Sciences 10

14%

Engineering 5

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0