Robust Domain Adaptation: Representations, Weights and Inductive Bias

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) has attracted a lot of attention in the last ten years. The emergence of Domain Invariant Representations (IR) has improved drastically the transferability of representations from a labelled source domain to a new and unlabelled target domain. However, a potential pitfall of this approach, namely the presence of label shift, has been brought to light. Some works address this issue with a relaxed version of domain invariance obtained by weighting samples, a strategy often referred to as Importance Sampling. From our point of view, the theoretical aspects of how Importance Sampling and Invariant Representations interact in UDA have not been studied in depth. In the present work, we present a bound of the target risk which incorporates both weights and invariant representations. Our theoretical analysis highlights the role of inductive bias in aligning distributions across domains. We illustrate it on standard benchmarks by proposing a new learning procedure for UDA. We observed empirically that weak inductive bias makes adaptation more robust. The elaboration of stronger inductive bias is a promising direction for new UDA algorithms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouvier, V., Very, P., Chastagnol, C., Tami, M., & Hudelot, C. (2021). Robust Domain Adaptation: Representations, Weights and Inductive Bias. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12457 LNAI, pp. 353–377). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67658-2_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free