Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: Findings from the U.S. scoliosis cohort study

507Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Study Design. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 5573 female patients with scoliosis who were referred for treatment at 14 orthopedic medical centers in the United States. Patients were less than 20 years of age at diagnosis which occurred between 1912 and 1965. Objectives. To evaluate patterns in breast cancer mortality among women with scoliosis, with special emphasis on risk associated with diagnostic radiograph exposures. Summary of Background Data. A pilot study of 1030 women with scoliosis revealed a nearly twofold statistically significant increased risk for incident breast cancer. Although based on only 11 cases, findings were consistent with radiation as a causative factor. Methods. Medical records were reviewed for information on personal characteristics and scoliosis history. Diagnostic radiograph exposures were tabulated based on review of radiographs, radiology reports in the medical records, radiograph jackers, and radiology log books. Radiation doses were estimated for individual examinations. The morality rate of the cohort through January 1, 1997, was determined by using state and national vital statistics records and was compared with that of women in the general U. S. population. Results. Nearly 138,000 radiographic examinations were recorded. The average number of examinations per patient was 24.7 (range, 0-618); mean estimated cumulative radiation dose to the breast was 10.8 cGy (range, 0-170). After excluding patients with missing information, 5466 patients were included in breast cancer mortality analyses. Their mean age at diagnosis was 10.6 years and average length of follow-up was 40.1 years. There were 77 breast cancer deaths observed compared with the 45.6 deaths expected on the basis of U.S. morality rates (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] = 1.69; 95% confidence interval [Cl] = 1.3-2.1). Risk increased significantly with increasing number of radiograph exposures and with cumulative radiation dose. The unadjusted excess relative risk per Gy was 5.4 (95% Cl = 1.2-14.1); when analyses were restricted to patients who had undergone at least one radiographic examination, the risk estimate was 2.7 (95% Cl = -0.2-9.3). Conclusions. These data suggest that exposure to multiple diagnostic radiographic examinations during childhood and adolescence may increase the risk of breast cancer among women with scoliosis; however, potential confounding between radiation dose and severity of disease and thus with reproductive history may explain some of the increased risk observed.

References Powered by Scopus

Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin's disease

847Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part I. Cancer: 1950-1990

671Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of relative survival and proportional mortality

512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2

0
1577Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know

1407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ICRP publication 118: ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions and Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs — Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context

1054Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morin Doody, M., Lonstein, J. E., Stovall, M., Hacker, D. G., Luckyanov, N., & Land, C. E. (2000). Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: Findings from the U.S. scoliosis cohort study. Spine, 25(16), 2052–2063. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200008150-00009

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

67%

Researcher 16

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 60

65%

Engineering 15

16%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0