Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients

4.1kCitations
Citations of this article
1.3kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The optimal target range for blood glucose in critically ill patients remains unclear. METHODS Within 24 hours after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), adults who were expected to require treatment in the ICU on 3 or more consecutive days were randomly assigned to undergo either intensive glucose control, with a target blood glucose range of 81 to 108 mg per deciliter (4.5 to 6.0 mmol per liter), or conventional glucose control, with a target of 180 mg or less per deciliter (10.0 mmol or less per liter). We defined the primary end point as death from any cause within 90 days after randomization. RESULTS Of the 6104 patients who underwent randomization, 3054 were assigned to undergo intensive control and 3050 to undergo conventional control; data with regard to the primary outcome at day 90 were available for 3010 and 3012 patients, respectively. The two groups had similar characteristics at baseline. A total of 829 patients (27.5%) in the intensive-control group and 751 (24.9%) in the conventional-control group died (odds ratio for intensive control, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.28; P=0.02). The treatment effect did not differ significantly between operative (surgical) patients and nonoperative (medical) patients (odds ratio for death in the intensive-control group, 1.31 and 1.07, respectively; P=0.10). Severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose level, < or = 40 mg per deciliter [2.2 mmol per liter]) was reported in 206 of 3016 patients (6.8%) in the intensive-control group and 15 of 3014 (0.5%) in the conventional-control group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the median number of days in the ICU (P=0.84) or hospital (P=0.86) or the median number of days of mechanical ventilation (P=0.56) or renal-replacement therapy (P=0.39). CONCLUSIONS In this large, international, randomized trial, we found that intensive glucose control increased mortality among adults in the ICU: a blood glucose target of 180 mg or less per deciliter resulted in lower mortality than did a target of 81 to 108 mg per deciliter. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00220987.)

References Powered by Scopus

APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system

14598Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients

8633Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis

8083Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation

7939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

4935Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012

4874Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. (2009). New England Journal of Medicine, 360(13), 1283–1297. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0810625

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25050100150200

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 397

54%

Researcher 201

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 107

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 25

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 723

87%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 52

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 35

4%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 10
News Mentions: 19
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 65

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0