Alkali–silica reaction in volcanic rocks: a worldwide comparative approach

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The potential alkali–silica reactivity (ASR) of volcanic aggregates, especially basalts, remains a source of debate in the scientific community. When evaluating the potentially deleterious character of this type of aggregate, different laboratory testing methods may produce contradictory data; this is particularly evident when using the accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT). In order to better understand such discrepancies, this study applied several methods of characterizing potential aggregate alkali reactivity, including the accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT), petrographic characterization, and the concrete prism test (CPT). Moreover, this study assessed volcanic aggregate samples from sites around the world, including the Azores, Brazil, Canada, the Canary and Hawaiian Islands, Iceland, Japan, Mozambique, New Zealand, Norway, and Turkey. The results obtained contribute to accurately assessing the potential alkali reactivity of volcanic aggregates and enhance the understanding of their different behaviours.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

RILEM recommendations for the prevention of damage by alkali-aggregate reactions in new concrete structures: State-of-the-Art report of the RILEM technical committee 219-ACS

52Citations
42Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Damage investigations on natural fiber-epoxy human prosthetic composites toughened using echinoidea spike β-chitin biopolymer

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Medeiros, S., Fernandes, I., Fournier, B., Nunes, J. C., Santos-Silva, A., Ramos, V., & Soares, D. (2022). Alkali–silica reaction in volcanic rocks: a worldwide comparative approach. Materiales de Construccion, 72(346). https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2022.16221

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 1

25%

Materials Science 1

25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

25%

Environmental Science 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0