Internet of Health Things: Toward intelligent vital signs monitoring in hospital wards

224Citations
Citations of this article
534Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Large amounts of patient data are routinely manually collected in hospitals by using standalone medical devices, including vital signs. Such data is sometimes stored in spreadsheets, not forming part of patients’ electronic health records, and is therefore difficult for caregivers to combine and analyze. One possible solution to overcome these limitations is the interconnection of medical devices via the Internet using a distributed platform, namely the Internet of Things. This approach allows data from different sources to be combined in order to better diagnose patient health status and identify possible anticipatory actions. Methods: This work introduces the concept of the Internet of Health Things (IoHT), focusing on surveying the different approaches that could be applied to gather and combine data on vital signs in hospitals. Common heuristic approaches are considered, such as weighted early warning scoring systems, and the possibility of employing intelligent algorithms is analyzed. Results: As a result, this article proposes possible directions for combining patient data in hospital wards to improve efficiency, allow the optimization of resources, and minimize patient health deterioration. Conclusion: It is concluded that a patient-centered approach is critical, and that the IoHT paradigm will continue to provide more optimal solutions for patient management in hospital wards.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

da Costa, C. A., Pasluosta, C. F., Eskofier, B., da Silva, D. B., & da Rosa Righi, R. (2018, July 1). Internet of Health Things: Toward intelligent vital signs monitoring in hospital wards. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2018.05.005

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 173

70%

Researcher 34

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 27

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 95

42%

Engineering 69

31%

Medicine and Dentistry 33

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 28

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free