The who and why of pain: Analysis by social class

13Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Physicians with an interest in pain have long suggested that the poor complain more and have a higher prevalence of neuroticism than do higher social groups. This assumption was tested by analysing the pain patterns in 500 consecutive patients attending a pain relief clinic. Results implied that scores for presenting pain, anxiety, and depression were similar in all social groups. After treatment scores for residual pain were significantly lower in all social classes, with greatest reduction in classes III, IV, and V. Almost identical results were obtained in a subgroup of patients with cancer but not in a subgroup with sciatica. That patients from the lower social classes have a higher perception of pain and are more neurotic than other groups is a myth, probably resulting from poor communication between clinicians and patients of dissimilar socioeconomic class.

References Powered by Scopus

MEASUREMENT OF PAIN

3392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient Delay in Cancer

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scores on Three Personality Variables as a Function of Age, Sex and Social Class

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Is emotional disturbance a precipitator or a consequence of chronic pain?

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of psychological factors in chronic pain. II. A critical appraisal

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are there reliable predictors of postoperative pain?

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larson, A. G., & Marcer, D. (1984). The who and why of pain: Analysis by social class. British Medical Journal, 288(6421), 883–886. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6421.883

Readers over time

‘09‘11‘12‘14‘16‘17‘19‘20‘22‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

76%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Researcher 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

33%

Arts and Humanities 5

33%

Psychology 3

20%

Engineering 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0