Vv > vc > v for stress: Coercion vs. prominence

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A common approach to ternary VV > VC > V weight for stress involves coerced moraicity, by which codas are moraic only under stress, when no VV is available. As I show, coercion is untenable for about half of 17 such systems surveyed, and must be augmented by a theory of vowel prominence (e.g., VV-TO-STRESS). I further argue that vowel prominence is superior to a previously suggested solution in terms of coda prominence, which favors stress on syllables with (nonmoraic) codas.

References Powered by Scopus

The quantitative trochee in Latin

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sonority Constraints on Syllable Structure

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A phonetically driven account of syllable weight

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Codas are universally moraic

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complex weight distinctions in Harmonic Serialism

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimising Classical Arabic metra

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ryan, K. M. (2020). Vv > vc > v for stress: Coercion vs. prominence. Linguistic Inquiry, 51(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00325

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 3

60%

Mathematics 1

20%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0