Forecasting elections with non-representative polls

262Citations
Citations of this article
417Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Election forecasts have traditionally been based on representative polls, in which randomly sampled individuals are asked who they intend to vote for. While representative polling has historically proven to be quite effective, it comes at considerable costs of time and money. Moreover, as response rates have declined over the past several decades, the statistical benefits of representative sampling have diminished. In this paper, we show that, with proper statistical adjustment, non-representative polls can be used to generate accurate election forecasts, and that this can often be achieved faster and at a lesser expense than traditional survey methods. We demonstrate this approach by creating forecasts from a novel and highly non-representative survey dataset: a series of daily voter intention polls for the 2012 presidential election conducted on the Xbox gaming platform. After adjusting the Xbox responses via multilevel regression and poststratification, we obtain estimates which are in line with the forecasts from leading poll analysts, which were based on aggregating hundreds of traditional polls conducted during the election cycle. We conclude by arguing that non-representative polling shows promise not only for election forecasting, but also for measuring public opinion on a broad range of social, economic and cultural issues.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey

754Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples

578Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?

558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Statistical rethinking: A bayesian course with examples in R and stan

1116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Generalizability of Survey Experiments

875Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

770Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, W., Rothschild, D., Goel, S., & Gelman, A. (2015). Forecasting elections with non-representative polls. International Journal of Forecasting, 31(3), 980–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 183

61%

Researcher 61

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 40

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 18

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 122

59%

Computer Science 34

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 25

12%

Mathematics 25

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 10
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 39

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0