Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity: NAN Policy & Planning Committee

747Citations
Citations of this article
231Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Symptom exaggeration or fabrication occurs in a sizeable minority of neuropsychological examinees, with greater prevalence in forensic contexts. Adequate assessment of response validity is essential in order to maximize confidence in the results of neurocognitive and personality measures and in the diagnoses and recommendations that are based on the results. Symptom validity assessment may include specific tests, indices, and observations. The manner in which symptom validity is assessed may vary depending on context but must include a thorough examination of cultural factors. Assessment of response validity, as a component of a medically necessary evaluation, is medically necessary. When determined by the neuropsychologist to be necessary for the assessment of response validity, administration of specific symptom validity tests are also medically necessary. © 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of National Academy of Neuropsychology.

References Powered by Scopus

Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.

0
2261Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration

860Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research

797Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering

758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neuropsychologists validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of north American professionals

309Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering

299Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., … Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity: NAN Policy & Planning Committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 87

60%

Researcher 30

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 23

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 133

77%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

10%

Neuroscience 16

9%

Social Sciences 5

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free