Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001

636Citations
Citations of this article
394Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To examine American beverage consumption trends and causes. Nationally representative data from the 1977-1978 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey, the 1989-1991 and 1994-1996 (also for children aged 2 to 9 years in 1998) Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII), and 1999-2001 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used in this study. The sample consisted of 73,345 individuals, aged 2 years. For each survey year, the percentage of total energy intake from meals and snacks was calculated separately for respondents aged ≥2 to 18 years, 19 to 39, 40 to 59, and ≥60. The percentage of energy intake by location (at home consumption or preparation, vending, store eaten out, restaurant/fast food, and school), as well as for specific beverages was computed separately for all age groups. The proportion consumed, mean portion size, and number of servings were calculated. For all age groups, sweetened beverage consumption increased and milk consumption decreased. Overall, energy intake from sweetened beverages increased 135% and was reduced by 38% from milk, with a 278 total calorie increase. These trends were associated with increased proportions of Americans consuming larger portions, more servings per day of sweetened beverage, and reductions in these same measures for milk. There is little research that has focused on the beneficial impacts of reduced soft drink and fruit drink intake. This would seem to be one of the simpler ways to reduce obesity in the United States. © 2004 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nielsen, S. J., & Popkin, B. M. (2004). Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.05.005

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 162

70%

Researcher 42

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 17

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 84

42%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 40

20%

Social Sciences 28

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 2
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free