Accounting for detectability improves estimates of species richness in tropical bat surveys

87Citations
Citations of this article
456Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1. Species richness is a state variable of some interest in monitoring programmes but raw species counts are often biased due to imperfect species detectability. Therefore, monitoring programmes should quantify detectability for target taxa to assess whether it varies over temporal or spatial scales. We assessed the potential for tropical bat monitoring programmes to reliably estimate trends in species richness. 2. Using data from 25 bat assemblages from the Old and New World tropics, we estimated detectability for all species in an assemblage (mean proportion of species detected per sampling plot) and for individual species (species-specific detectability). We further assessed how these estimates of detectability were affected by external sources of variation relating to time, space, survey effort and biological traits. 3. The mean proportion of species detected across 96 sampling plots was estimated at 0·76 (range 0·57-1·00) and was significantly greater for phytophagous than for animalivorous species. Species-averaged detectability for phytophagous species was influenced by the number of surveys and season, whereas the number of surveys and sampling methods [ground- or canopy-level mist nets, harp traps and acoustic sampling (AS)] most strongly affected estimates of detectability for animalivorous bats. Species-specific detectability averaged 0·4 and was highly heterogeneous across 232 species, with estimates ranging from 0·03 to 0·84. Species-level detectability was influenced by a range of external factors such as location, season, or sampling method, suggesting that raw species counts may sometimes be strongly biased. 4. Synthesis and applications.Due to generally high species-specific detection probabilities, Neotropical aerial insectivorous bats proved to be well suited for monitoring using AS. However, for species with low detectability, such as most gleaning animalivores or nectarivores, count data obtained in bat monitoring surveys must be corrected for detection bias. Our results indicate that species-averaged detection probabilities will rarely approach 1 unless many surveys are conducted. Consequently, long-term bat monitoring programmes need to adopt an estimation scheme that corrects for variation in detectability when comparing species richness over time and when making regional comparisons. Similar corrections will be needed for other species-rich tropical taxa. © 2011 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

References Powered by Scopus

The status of the world's land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge

1232Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time

1105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The mid-domain effect: Geometric constraints on the geography of species richness

925Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

What's on the horizon for macroecology?

176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing biodiversity with sound: Do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and functional diversities of bird communities?

149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Citizen science reveals trends in bat populations: The National Bat Monitoring Programme in Great Britain

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyer, C. F. J., Aguiar, L. M. S., Aguirre, L. F., Baumgarten, J., Clarke, F. M., Cosson, J. F., … Kalko, E. K. V. (2011). Accounting for detectability improves estimates of species richness in tropical bat surveys. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01976.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 197

62%

Researcher 86

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 26

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 282

76%

Environmental Science 81

22%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

1%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

1%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 9

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free