Sexting and Sexual Behavior, 2011–2015: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of a Growing Literature

102Citations
Citations of this article
196Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sexting and its potential links to sexual behavior, including risky sexual practices, have received scholarly scrutiny, but this literature is marked by divergent perspectives and disparate findings. To assess claims regarding the nature of the relationship between sexting and sexual behavior, we conducted a critical review of the literature and analyzed data from 15 articles via quantitative meta-analytic techniques. Sexting behavior was positively related to sexual activity, unprotected sex, and one's number of sexual partners, but the relationship was weak to moderate. Additional information, gleaned from a critical review of included studies, helped contextualize these findings and point to specific limitations and directions for future research.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

26899Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model

3683Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fixed- and Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis

2362Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sexting among adolescents: A nuanced and gendered online challenge for young people

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sexting, mental health, and victimization among adolescents: A literature review

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sexting scripts in adolescent relationships: Is sexting becoming the norm?

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kosenko, K., Luurs, G., & Binder, A. R. (2017). Sexting and Sexual Behavior, 2011–2015: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of a Growing Literature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12187

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 70

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 17

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

10%

Researcher 8

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 43

43%

Psychology 42

42%

Business, Management and Accounting 8

8%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0