Effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in Indonesia: Observational studies with retrospectives

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Effectiveness data can describe the results or performance of an intervention (treatment) in daily clinical practice and also provide recommendations to policymakers regarding the need or not of health technology to be implemented into the health care system. Research related to the effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib is still minimal, especially in Indonesia. This study aims to provide an overview of the effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib in daily clinical practice (the real world) as first-line therapy. This research is an observational study with a retrospective approach that observes the medical records of NSCLC patients who have EGFR mutations in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta and Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Semarang, Java Island, Indonesia in the period January 2016-March 2019. The effectiveness seen is the Progress Free Survival and Overall Survival based on the patient’s medical records and analyzed using the Kaplan Meier test to see survival. There were 113 patients identified, 27 patients using afatinib, and 86 patients using gefitinib. Afatinib had significantly superior progression-free survival (448 days or 14.7 months; 95% CI = 12-17.4 months; p = 0.002) compared to gefitinib (344 days or 11.3 months; 95% CI = 8, 4-14.3 months), however, overall survival of afatinib is no better than gefitinib (472 days or 15.5 months; 95% CI = 13.8-17.2 months vs 653 days or 21.4 months; 95% CI = 18-24.8 months) with a value of p = 0.302. Afatinib has superior progression-free survival compared to gefitinib, but not overall survival as first-line therapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

67148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial

3851Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): A phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial

1024Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Afatinib versus Gefitinib in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation in Indonesia: Observational studies with Retrospectives

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The comparative effectiveness of first-line treatment EGFR TKIs in Asian lung cancer population: A systematic review and meta-analysis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sari, S., Andayani, T. M., Endarti, D., & Widayati, K. (2019). Effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in Indonesia: Observational studies with retrospectives. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 10(4), 3516–3522. https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1727

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 4

50%

Psychology 3

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0