A diversified Tabu search approach for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty

150Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper presents a metaheuristic solution approach based on Tabu search for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty. To search the feasible domain more extensively, two different diversification strategies are used to generate several initial solutions to be optimized by the Tabu search procedure. The first diversification strategy exploits a long-term memory of the search history. The second one relies on the variable neighborhood search method. Numerical results on realistic large-scale instances are provided to indicate the efficiency of the solution approach to produce very good solutions in relatively short computational times. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Variable neighborhood search: Principles and applications

1592Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty: Second Edition

927Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tabu search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem

862Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Global optimization of open pit mining complexes with uncertainty

160Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long term production planning of open pit mines by ant colony optimization

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimizing mining complexes with multiple processing and transportation alternatives: An uncertainty-based approach

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lamghari, A., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2012). A diversified Tabu search approach for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(3), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.029

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 65

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

15%

Researcher 10

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 69

76%

Computer Science 13

14%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

7%

Decision Sciences 3

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free