Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control

2.4kCitations
Citations of this article
2.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We quantified the biomass allocation patterns to leaves, stems and roots in vegetative plants, and how this is influenced by the growth environment, plant size, evolutionary history and competition. Dose-response curves of allocation were constructed by means of a meta-analysis from a wide array of experimental data. They show that the fraction of whole-plant mass represented by leaves (LMF) increases most strongly with nutrients and decreases most strongly with light. Correction for size-induced allocation patterns diminishes the LMF-response to light, but makes the effect of temperature on LMF more apparent. There is a clear phylogenetic effect on allocation, as eudicots invest relatively more than monocots in leaves, as do gymnosperms compared with woody angiosperms. Plants grown at high densities show a clear increase in the stem fraction. However, in most comparisons across species groups or environmental factors, the variation in LMF is smaller than the variation in one of the other components of the growth analysis equation: the leaf area:leaf mass ratio (SLA). In competitive situations, the stem mass fraction increases to a smaller extent than the specific stem length (stem length:stem mass). Thus, we conclude that plants generally are less able to adjust allocation than to alter organ morphology. © 2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poorter, H., Niklas, K. J., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., & Mommer, L. (2012, January). Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 989

64%

Researcher 393

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 134

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 34

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 998

63%

Environmental Science 463

29%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 91

6%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 41

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
References: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 23

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free