A scoping review of the literature of research ethics committees and ethics review framework in Pakistan: What we know and what we still need to learn

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To map literature on research ethics committees, institutional review boards and ethics review framework in Pakistan to identify key insights during public health emergencies and normal times. Method: The systematic scoping review was conducted in April 2022, and comprised literature search on PubMed, World Health Organisation Global Index Medicus and Summons databases for articles published between January 2005 and February 2022. Information extracted included authors names, year of publication, title, study methodology, and key insights under the heads of challenges and solutions. Due to data heterogeneity, key themes were identified and analysed. Results: Of the 2,190 studies initially identified, 21(0.95%) were subjected to full-Text review, and, from among them, 9(45%) were analysed in detail. There were 4 key insights identified: research ethics committees and institutional review boards in Pakistan remain unregulated as they are currently not registered or accredited by a competent national-level authority; most members of such committees are not formally trained to implement the mandate; internal and external pressures hinder independent decision-making of such committees; and other issues hindering the functionality and performance of research ethics committees and institutional review boards. Conclusion: Despite existing publications calling for urgent policy and regulatory reforms, there is a dearth of literature and minimal policy actions underlying the fact that ethics review remains a neglected area in Pakistan.

References Powered by Scopus

PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

19712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research

699Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Observing Bioethics

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Research Ethics and Research Ethics Committees among Post-Graduate Residents of Neurosciences - A Nationwide Analysis from Pakistan

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asif, F., Sultan, F., Masood, I., Baig, S., Ekmecki, P. E., Vaswani, V., … Crawley, F. (2023, August 1). A scoping review of the literature of research ethics committees and ethics review framework in Pakistan: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. Pakistan Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.8033

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

67%

Computer Science 1

33%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free