Impact of required storage space on storage policy performance in a unit-load warehouse

51Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The performance of a storage policy in a warehouse is usually evaluated on the basis of the average one-way travel distance/time needed to store/retrieve a load. Dividing the storage space into zones based on item turnover frequency can reduce the travel distance. However, for a given number of stored items, a larger number of storage zones also requires more storage space, because of reduced space sharing between the items, which increases travel time. This study considers the required space consumption by storage zoning in comparing the performance of random, full turnover-based and class-based storage policies for a unit-load warehouse operated by a forklift in single-command mode. A generalised travel distance model that considers the required space consumption is developed to compare the performance of these policies. Results show that the one-way travel distance of a random policy decreases with the increase in skewness of the demand curve. By considering the required space consumption, a class-based storage policy performs generally better than a full turnover-based policy. In addition, the optimal warehouse shape factor (ratio of warehouse width to depth) appears to decrease with the skewness of the demand curve. Warehouse managers are advised to adopt a wide-shallow warehouse layout when the item demands are approximately equal, whereas a narrow-deep layout is preferred when the demand curves are steep.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
741Citations
1354Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, X., Yu, Y., & De Koster, R. B. M. (2016). Impact of required storage space on storage policy performance in a unit-load warehouse. International Journal of Production Research, 54(8), 2405–2418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1083624

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Researcher 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 32

57%

Business, Management and Accounting 19

34%

Computer Science 3

5%

Decision Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0