The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry

1.6kCitations
Citations of this article
147Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A rapid and accurate atomic absorption method for the determination of chromium in faeces samples from pasture experiments using chromic oxide ‘markers’ is described. Of the elements present after ashing and digesting the samples in a phosphoric acid‘manganese sulphate’potassium bromate solution silicate, aluminium, calcium and magnesium were found to interfere in the determination. The effects of these interferences were overcome by the addition of calcium to the test solution and by the addition of silicate to the standards, which were prepared in ‘blank’ solutions. The sensitivities of a number of alternate chromium resonance lines relative to that of Cr 3578.7. are given. These lines may be used to increase the concentration range of the analysis. The results of a comparison of the atomic absorption method with a chemical method are given. © 1962, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition

389Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of yeast culture supplementation on growth performance, intestinal health, and immune response of nursery pigs

281Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of Source of Protein and Carbohydrate on Ruminal Fermentation and Passage of Nutrients to the Small Intestine of Lactating Cows

262Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, C. H., David, D. J., & Iismaa, O. (1962). The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 59(3), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001546X

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 57

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

15%

Researcher 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63

79%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 10

13%

Engineering 4

5%

Chemistry 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0